History
The route
In earlier years the next control was at the Marshall Store, but this control became overwhelmed by the tourists, and the Marshall Store often closed before the control itself would so the control was moved 10 miles south to Point Reyes Station where there are many more options for riders to refuel. From there, the route back follows the well used path through Olema, over Bolinas Ridge, through the redwoods, across the San Geronimo Valley and over White Hill and on to Fairfax and then lower Marin and on back to the south end of the Golden Gate Bridge. With the final return being through Olema in recent years, the shortest route from Bodega Bay to the Golden Gate Bridge is the route listed so soon the Olema control will disappear. Riders will still likely pause in PRS before making the final push to cover the last 35 miles of the route.
Comparing the difficulty of this route to other routes, Ridewithgps suggests there is about 8,200' of elevation gain on this route. The 200km routes used for the rides that not preceeds this one on the calendar every year range from 7,000' to 7,500'. Given that, the Healdsburg 300km is in some ways considered a treat. On the route from the point where riders are coasting down the last big roller before Petaluma, there are no significant climbs at all until riders reach the coast south of Jenner. As well, there is often a healthy tailwind as riders head south on CA 1.
Weather and scheduling
While there has been rain on several of the dates over the years, a few years stand out on the misery index. In 2007 rain began about 60-70 miles in and just kept getting worse through the day and was joined by high winds after sunset. In 2016 the rain began earlier and was also joined by gusting wind, but the difference between the two dates is that there were far fewer starters and finishers in 2016 to tell the tale afterward. The 2022 version was a chilly one, and one year riders had to watch out for black ice as late into the ride as Petaluma when the brevet was held just a day after a big rainstorm and freezing overnight temperatures. The total finishers dropped from 126 in 2015 to just 25 in 2016, just to show the difference between a fair weather year and one less than fair. Following behind on the scale of wet Healdsburg 300ks behind 2007 and 2016 are both the 2019 and 2020 editions, both of which were quite soggy.
Participants
SFR was a smaller club in the early years, so it is no surprise that the number of starters was lower. In 1999, there were 21 finishers and the total of finishers dropped as low as 13 on the 3rd running in 2004. In 2010 ridership on this event seemingly exploded and from 2010 through 2015 there were never fewer than 101 finishers, peaking with 126 finishers in 2015 (later exceeded in 2022). For a period of years, participation dwindled owing to several factors. Rain at the start and rain that begins much later in the ride have different effects. For 2007 the rain only began for most riders as they neared Windsor, close to 70 miles into the ride. Even though that is the most epic year for weather for those that have ridden multiple iterations of the Healdsburg 300, the number of starters and finishers that year (2007) is higher than in some subsequent years. 2021 may look odd with the weather having been so great but with one of the smallest starting rosters, but that was a pandemic year and turnout would only rebound much later that year.
[Editor's note: for some context, no other RUSA region has had even 100 starters for their 300km Whoops! that is wrong. Before 2008, RUSA records did not include the field for # of starters or # of DNF so for 1999 through 2007 we can only use # of finishers. In 2003 CA: Davis had 162 *finishers*. One can assume the # of starters was higher than that.]
No one rider has participated on all 21 events since 1999, and no rider is all that close. In the last few years this particular leader board has been jumbled a little and a new leader has emerged.:
Rider | No. of finishes |
---|---|
Holmgren, John | 15 |
HAGGERTY, Tom | 14 |
HAWKS, Rob | 14 |
BUNTROCK, Robert | 13 |
CLARKSON, Bryan | 13 |
HASTINGS, Geoff | 13 |
DUQUE, Carlos | 12 |
JOHNSON, Ken | 12 |
MCCAW, Richard | 12 |
PIERCE, Jason | 11 |
Houck, Timothy | 10 |
UZ, Metin | 10 |
Haas, Stephen | 9 |
Andersen, Gabrielle | 8 |
BEATO, Greg | 8 |
BEATO, Keith | 8 |
BERG, Bruce R | 8 |
BRIER, Bill | 8 |
BUDVYTIS, Gintautas | 8 |
Chun, Brian | 8 |
EMERSON, Ken | 8 |
KILGORE, Bryan | 8 |
KOSS, Brian | 8 |
NEVIN, Willy | 8 |
TEACHOUT, Todd | 8 |
There has been 1431 finishers over the course of the 21 versions of the event.
Ride times
For riders with at least 3 finishes, Andrea Achilli looks to be the most consistent with his shortest and longest finishes within 40 minutes of each other (followed by Russ Fairles' 44 minute difference). Riding the event on a particularly rainy date (2007, 2016, 2019, 2020) can easily lengthen your elapased time by over a hour, and more. Glancing at the results we can find a number of riders with three or more finishes with a four hour difference between shortest and longest ride, but Bob Buntrock's 6 hour and 13 minute delta stands out. Bob's two bookend finishes were 11:36 in 2011, and 17:49 in 2004.
Here are the groupings of finishers by hour:
Finally, here is a table of the starters per edition from 1999 through 2022, NB: RUSA doesn't have DNF numbers available to RBAs prior to 2009:
Date | # of Starters | # of Finishers | # of DNF riders | First Finishing Time | Mean Finishing Time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1999/02/20 | 22 | 14:00 | 17:32 | ||
2003/02/15 | 30 | 13:44 | 16:20 | ||
2004/02/14 | 13 | 13:49 | 15:57 | ||
2005/02/26 | 33 | 11:46 | 13:52 | ||
2006/02/25 | 56 | 11:19 | 14:25 | ||
2007/02/24 | 75 | 12:03 | 16:04 | ||
2008/02/23 | 33 | 31 | 2 | 11:55 | 14:17 |
2009/02/21 | 71 | 68 | 3 | 11:20 | 14:38 |
2010/02/27 | 117 | 110 | 7 | 11:27 | 14:54 |
2011/02/26 | 118 | 108 | 10 | 11:36 | 15:02 |
2012/03/10 | 105 | 101 | 4 | 11:30 | 14:16 |
2013/03/09 | 111 | 107 | 4 | 11:03 | 14:36 |
2014/03/08 | 125 | 122 | 3 | 11:05 | 14:34 |
2015/02/28 | 126 | 126 | 0 | 11:15 | 15:02 |
2016/03/05 | 32 | 25 | 7 | 14:00 | 16:38 |
2017/03/18 | 58 | 55 | 3 | 10:40 | 14:18 |
2018/03/10 | 92 | 87 | 5 | 10:50 | 14:14 |
2019/03/09 | 72 | 61 | 11 | 13:06 | 16:17 |
2020/03/07 | 54 | 40 | 14 | 12:02 | 14:57 |
2021/06/26 | 26 | 26 | 0 | 9:49 | 13:27 |
2022/03/12 | 140 | 135 | 5 | 10:10 | 15:07 |
NB: The data used all comes from RUSA databases. SFR data is not uniformly stored (different columns, different name varients, missing rows) so was not used. Names have been normalized as much as possible, but if members changed how they submitted names as they renew memberships (including middle intial or not, spelling middle name vs. initial, changing last name) these variants need to be collected then normalized. It is possible that some variants were overlooked during this manual step.
Comments